Table | Card | RUSMARC | |
Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Annotation
SSGF, как новая система строительства, была легко продвинута правительством Китая, чтобы заменить традиционную монолитную конструкцию и построить за рубежом. Тем не менее, из-за того, что SSGF является совершенно новым видом строительной системы и только что был введен в эксплуатацию не более 5 лет, существует очень мало информации или исследований, связанных с ней, что приводит к трудностям в ее продвижении. Таким образом, это исследование объединило все существующие исследования, связанные с SSGF, и восполнило пробел в исследовании, чтобы сформировать техническую модель для углубления понимания SSGF. Кроме того, SSGF проводит три реальных случая, монолитное строительство и сборное железобетонное строительство, соответственно, чтобы сравнить различия между строительными характеристиками, количеством, экологическими характеристиками и продолжительностью, а также запросить процесс строительства и строительную организацию SSGF. Результаты этого исследования показали, что количество SSGF довольно велико и может достигать уровня сборных конструкций. Экологические характеристики SSGF лучше, чем у монолитных конструкций, и их продолжительность значительно меньше по сравнению с другими методами строительства.
SSGF, as a new set of construction system, has been effortlessly promoted by Chinese government to replace traditional cast-in-place construction and to construct abroad. However, due to the fact that SSGF is brand new kind of con-struction system and just been put in use no more than 5 years, there are very few information or studies relevant with it, which results in difficulties in its promotion. Therefore, this study integrated all existing research related to SSGF and fulfilled the research gap to form a technical model to deepen the understand-ing of SSGF. Also, three real-life case are conducted by SSGF, Cast-in-place con-struction and prefabricated concrete construction respectively to compare the dif-ferences of construction performance, quantity, environmental performance and duration and inquire the construction process and construction arrangement of SSGF. The results of this study indicated that the quantity of SSGF is pretty high and can reach the level of prefabricated construction. The environment perfor-mance of SSGF is better than that of cast-in-place construction and the duration is significant short comparing with other construction method.
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILC SPbPU Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Authorized users SPbPU | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- 23141-12_ Wang_Y.pdf.pdf
- INTRODUCTION
- CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW AND INTRODUCTION OF SSGF
- 1.1. Background and conception of SSGF
- 1.1.1. Background of SSGF
- 1.1.2. General concept of SSGF
- 1.2. Development history of SSGF
- 1.3. Technology system
- 1.3.1. High precision process system
- 1.1.1.1. Aluminum formwork
- 1.3.1.2. High precision concrete flooring
- 1.3.2. Long-term anti-leakage system
- 1.3.2.1. Whole CIP external wall
- 1.3.2.2. Self-healing waterproof
- 1.3.3. Prefabricated construction system
- 1.3.3.1. Prefabricated internal wall system and PC components
- 1.3.3.2. Integral bathroom unit
- 1.3.4. Whole-process high-efficient construction system
- 1.3.4.1. Self-climbing scaffold
- 1.3.4.2. Full intersecting construction
- 1.3.4.3. Water-interception system
- 1.3.5. Fine decoration construction system
- 1.3.5.1. Water cannon picking
- 1.3.5.2. PVC wallpaper
- 1.3.6. Visual technology model of SSGF
- 1.3.1. High precision process system
- 1.4. Research aim and research object
- 1.4.1. Research aim
- 1.4.2. Research object
- 1.1. Background and conception of SSGF
- CHAPTER 2. CASE ANALYSIS
- 2.1. Base data
- 2.1.1. Sample buildings
- 2.1.2. Description of building components and building materials
- 2.1.3. Normative labor base
- 2.2. Construction quantity calculation of sample buildings
- 2.2.1. Quantity of reinforcement installation
- 2.2.2. Construction quantity calculation of CIP sample building
- 2.2.3. Construction quantity calculation of SSGF sample building
- 2.2.4. Construction quantity calculation of PC sample building
- 2.3. Duration modeling of sample buildings
- 2.3.1. Duration determination of SSGF sample
- 2.3.2. Duration determination of CIP sample
- 2.3.3. Duration determination of PC sample
- 3.2.4. Construction schedules of building samples
- 2.1. Base data
- CHAPTER 3. COMPARISON AND DISCUSSION AMONG SSGF, CIP AND PC CONSTRUCTION
- 3.1. Technical advantages of SSGF compared to CIP and PC
- 3.1.1. High quality of SSGF
- 3.1.2. Outstanding construction performance of SSGF comparing with CIP and PC
- 3.2. Environmental performance comparison between SSGF and CIP
- 3.3. Construction duration comparison and analysis among SSGF, CIP and PC
- 3.3.1. Comparison and analysis base on construction arrangement
- 3.3.2. Comparison and analysis base on labor hour
- 3.1. Technical advantages of SSGF compared to CIP and PC
- CONCLUSION
- REFERENCES
- APPENDIX 1
- APPENDIX 2
- 23141-12_ Wang_Y.pdf.pdf
Usage statistics
Access count: 66
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |