Details
Title | NON-DISCRIMINATION IN TAX TREATY LAW AND WORLD TRADE LAW: the impact of formal, substantive ... and subjective approaches. |
---|---|
Creators | DZIURDZ KASPER. |
Collection | Электронные книги зарубежных издательств ; Общая коллекция |
Subjects | OECD Model. ; non-discrimination. ; tax treaty. ; business law. ; MFN. ; national treatment. ; GATT. ; GATS. ; harmful tax competition. ; hybrid mismatch. ; thin capitalization. ; tax rate. ; losses. ; group treatment. ; double taxation relief. ; comparability test. ; discrimination. ; case law. ; Taxation — Law and legislation. ; Foreign trade regulation. ; EBSCO eBooks |
Document type | Other |
File type | Other |
Language | English |
Rights | Доступ по паролю из сети Интернет (чтение, печать, копирование) |
Record key | on1230505212 |
Record create date | 1/13/2021 |
Allowed Actions
–
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group | Anonymous |
---|---|
Network | Internet |
Non-discrimination is a central obligation under both tax treaty and trade law. However, in seeking to strike a balance between national and international interests, its application differs in the two areas of practice. This book explains the policy issues and how non-discrimination analysis works, provides a comprehensive review of non-discrimination rules in WTO and tax treaty law, combining a critical commentary on case law with proposals for an innovative concept for solving cases of discrimination in tax treaty law. Among the practical issues affecting non-discrimination examined in detail are the following: implications that can be drawn from the concepts of non-discrimination under WTO law and Article 24 of the OECD Model; direct and indirect discrimination and analysis of comparability in WTO law and tax treaty law; the most-favoured-nation (MFN) and national treatment (NT) rules under the GATT and GATS; the meaning of 'likeness' and 'less favourable treatment'; claiming non-discriminatory tax treatment before tax administrations and courts under a tax treaty; justification of measures against harmful tax competition, low taxation and hybrid mismatch arrangements; thin capitalization rules, progressive tax rates, foreign losses, group taxation and relief from juridical and economic double taxation under Article 24 of the OECD Model; and integrating a justification defence into any stage of a non-discrimination analysis. The author establishes to what extent formal, substantive and subjective approaches may be applied in a non-discrimination analysis, providing the reasons for the approaches taken. A two-step comparability procedure is applied to selected cases of potential tax discrimination, demonstrating how policy arguments can be addressed under Article 24 of the OECD Model.
Network | User group | Action |
---|---|---|
ILC SPbPU Local Network | All |
|
Internet | Authorized users SPbPU |
|
Internet | Anonymous |
|
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0