?

Details
Table Card RUSMARC
Title: Dogmatik in der Moderne. Bonhoeffer's Theology of the Cross: the Influence of Luther in ""Act and Being""
Creators: Keijzer J. I. de.
Imprint: Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019
Collection: Электронные книги зарубежных издательств; Общая коллекция
Subjects: EBSCO eBooks
Document type: Other
File type: PDF
Language: English
Rights: Доступ по паролю из сети Интернет (чтение, печать, копирование)
Record key: on1126214089

Allowed Actions: –

Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network

Group: Anonymous

Network: Internet

Document access rights

Network User group Action
ILC SPbPU Local Network All Read Print Download
Internet Authorized users SPbPU Read Print Download
-> Internet Anonymous

Table of Contents

  • Cover
  • Titel
  • Acknowledgments
  • Table of Contents
  • List of Abbreviations
  • Chapter 1: Introduction: Confessions of a Crypto-Lutheran
    • 1.1 A Forest of Bonhoeffer Interpretations
    • 1.2 A Lutheran Bonhoeffer
    • 1.3 Act and Being as Theologia Crucis
    • 1.4 Overview
  • Chapter 2: Fate or Idea: Bonhoeffer as Subversive Reader of Barth
    • 2.1 Material Evidence
    • 2.2 Historical Context
    • 2.3 Barth’s Argument in Fate and Idea
    • 2.4 Differences and Similarities
    • 2.5 Drawing Conclusions
      • 2.5.1 Influence and Disagreement
      • 2.5.2 Act and Being as Alternative
      • 2.5.3 Developing a Theologia Crucis
  • Chapter 3: Crucis or Crisis: Bonhoeffer and Barth
    • 3.1 Hermeneutical Preamble
    • 3.2 Different Readings of a Relationship
    • 3.3 Encounter and Dialogue
    • 3.4 Bonhoeffer’s Critique of Barth
      • 3.4.1 Communio Sanctorum
      • 3.4.2 Act and Being
      • 3.4.3 Inaugural Speech
      • 3.4.4 Letters and Papers from Prison
    • 3.5 The Theologia Crucis in Barth
      • 3.5.1. Bradbury’s Claim
      • 3.5.2 Case Studies in Barth
      • 3.5.3 Hunsinger’s Motifs
    • 3.6 Spatial Metaphors
    • 3.7 Scaling the Distance
  • Chapter 4: Distance or Presence: Exploring the Theologia Crucis
    • 4.1 Background of the Theologia Crucis
      • 4.1.1 Luther and Scholasticism
      • 4.1.2 Theologia Crucis as Response to Scholasticism
    • 4.2 Theologia Crucis as Distance
      • 4.2.1 Loewenich
      • 4.2.2 McGrath
    • 4.3 The Theology of the Cross in Philosophy
      • 4.3.1 Kant and Kierkegaard on Distance
      • 4.3.2 Hegel on Presence
    • 4.4 Presence Emphasized
      • 4.4.1 Simpson
      • 4.4.2 Jüngel
    • 4.5 Elements of a Theologia Crucis
  • Chapter 5: Theologia Crucis as Act and Being
    • 5.1 Act and Being
    • 5.2 Theologia Crucis as Act
      • 5.2.1 Epistemological Distance in Barth
      • 5.2.2 Bonhoeffer’s Critique of Barth Revisited
      • 5.2.3 Barth as Crypto Medieval Nominalist?
    • 5.3 Theologia Crucis as Being
      • 5.3.1 Theologia Crucis as Community
      • 5.3.2 Sanctorum Communio Sub Contrario
      • 5.3.3 Stellvertreter: Community-of-the-Cross
    • 5.4 Grafting Presence onto Being
  • Chapter 6: Christ’s and Christs: Bonhoeffer and Heidegger
    • 6.1 With and Without the Apostrophe
    • 6.2 Heidegger in Bonhoeffer Scholarship
      • 6.2.1 Charles Marsh
      • 6.2.2 Steven Plant
      • 6.2.3 Michael DeJonge
      • 6.2.4 Christiane Tietz-Steiding
      • 6.2.5 Evaluation
    • 6.3 Bonhoeffer’s Evaluation of Heidegger
    • 6.4 The Coordination of Act and Being
    • 6.5 The Analogical Use of Philosophy
  • Chapter 7: Act and Being as Theologia Crucis
    • 7.1 Summary of the Argument
    • 7.2 The Coordination of Act and Being
    • 7.3 Heidegger’s Being and the Theologia Crucis
      • 7.3.1 The Completion of Bonhoeffer’s Argument
      • 7.3.2 Theologia Crucis as Community
      • 7.3.3 Three-fold Function of the Theologia Crucis
      • 7.3.4 Cross Typologies Revisited
    • 7.4 Bonhoeffer Scholarship
      • 7.4.1 Important Themes in Bonhoeffer
      • 7.4.2 Some Areas of Interest
  • Bibliography
  • Index

Usage statistics

stat Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0
Detailed usage statistics