Details

Title Dogmatik in der Moderne. — Bonhoeffer's Theology of the Cross: the Influence of Luther in ""Act and Being"". – 2019.
Creators Keijzer J. I. de.
Imprint Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019
Collection Электронные книги зарубежных издательств ; Общая коллекция
Subjects EBSCO eBooks
Document type Other
File type PDF
Language English
Rights Доступ по паролю из сети Интернет (чтение, печать, копирование)
Record key on1126214089
Record create date 11/2/2019

Allowed Actions

Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network

Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network

Group Anonymous
Network Internet
Network User group Action
ILC SPbPU Local Network All
Read Print Download
Internet Authorized users SPbPU
Read Print Download
Internet Anonymous
  • Cover
  • Titel
  • Acknowledgments
  • Table of Contents
  • List of Abbreviations
  • Chapter 1: Introduction: Confessions of a Crypto-Lutheran
    • 1.1 A Forest of Bonhoeffer Interpretations
    • 1.2 A Lutheran Bonhoeffer
    • 1.3 Act and Being as Theologia Crucis
    • 1.4 Overview
  • Chapter 2: Fate or Idea: Bonhoeffer as Subversive Reader of Barth
    • 2.1 Material Evidence
    • 2.2 Historical Context
    • 2.3 Barth’s Argument in Fate and Idea
    • 2.4 Differences and Similarities
    • 2.5 Drawing Conclusions
      • 2.5.1 Influence and Disagreement
      • 2.5.2 Act and Being as Alternative
      • 2.5.3 Developing a Theologia Crucis
  • Chapter 3: Crucis or Crisis: Bonhoeffer and Barth
    • 3.1 Hermeneutical Preamble
    • 3.2 Different Readings of a Relationship
    • 3.3 Encounter and Dialogue
    • 3.4 Bonhoeffer’s Critique of Barth
      • 3.4.1 Communio Sanctorum
      • 3.4.2 Act and Being
      • 3.4.3 Inaugural Speech
      • 3.4.4 Letters and Papers from Prison
    • 3.5 The Theologia Crucis in Barth
      • 3.5.1. Bradbury’s Claim
      • 3.5.2 Case Studies in Barth
      • 3.5.3 Hunsinger’s Motifs
    • 3.6 Spatial Metaphors
    • 3.7 Scaling the Distance
  • Chapter 4: Distance or Presence: Exploring the Theologia Crucis
    • 4.1 Background of the Theologia Crucis
      • 4.1.1 Luther and Scholasticism
      • 4.1.2 Theologia Crucis as Response to Scholasticism
    • 4.2 Theologia Crucis as Distance
      • 4.2.1 Loewenich
      • 4.2.2 McGrath
    • 4.3 The Theology of the Cross in Philosophy
      • 4.3.1 Kant and Kierkegaard on Distance
      • 4.3.2 Hegel on Presence
    • 4.4 Presence Emphasized
      • 4.4.1 Simpson
      • 4.4.2 Jüngel
    • 4.5 Elements of a Theologia Crucis
  • Chapter 5: Theologia Crucis as Act and Being
    • 5.1 Act and Being
    • 5.2 Theologia Crucis as Act
      • 5.2.1 Epistemological Distance in Barth
      • 5.2.2 Bonhoeffer’s Critique of Barth Revisited
      • 5.2.3 Barth as Crypto Medieval Nominalist?
    • 5.3 Theologia Crucis as Being
      • 5.3.1 Theologia Crucis as Community
      • 5.3.2 Sanctorum Communio Sub Contrario
      • 5.3.3 Stellvertreter: Community-of-the-Cross
    • 5.4 Grafting Presence onto Being
  • Chapter 6: Christ’s and Christs: Bonhoeffer and Heidegger
    • 6.1 With and Without the Apostrophe
    • 6.2 Heidegger in Bonhoeffer Scholarship
      • 6.2.1 Charles Marsh
      • 6.2.2 Steven Plant
      • 6.2.3 Michael DeJonge
      • 6.2.4 Christiane Tietz-Steiding
      • 6.2.5 Evaluation
    • 6.3 Bonhoeffer’s Evaluation of Heidegger
    • 6.4 The Coordination of Act and Being
    • 6.5 The Analogical Use of Philosophy
  • Chapter 7: Act and Being as Theologia Crucis
    • 7.1 Summary of the Argument
    • 7.2 The Coordination of Act and Being
    • 7.3 Heidegger’s Being and the Theologia Crucis
      • 7.3.1 The Completion of Bonhoeffer’s Argument
      • 7.3.2 Theologia Crucis as Community
      • 7.3.3 Three-fold Function of the Theologia Crucis
      • 7.3.4 Cross Typologies Revisited
    • 7.4 Bonhoeffer Scholarship
      • 7.4.1 Important Themes in Bonhoeffer
      • 7.4.2 Some Areas of Interest
  • Bibliography
  • Index

Access count: 0 
Last 30 days: 0

Detailed usage statistics