Table | Card | RUSMARC | |
Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILC SPbPU Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Authorized users SPbPU | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright Information
- Abstract
- Section 01: Introduction
- 01a Preliminary notes for readers:
- 01b Table of contents
- 01c Preface
- 01d Guide for use of digital images (e-Figures)
- 01e National distributions of sites that appear in the analysis
- 01f Glossary of terms used in the analysis
- 01g Introduction
- Cues and targets for alignment
- Section 02: Cues for axial alignment
- Section 02a:
- The axis of monuments
- Definition and analysis of data
- Adequacy of published sources
- Precision and accuracy of data
- Use of context-free data sets
- Discussion of the axis
- Definition of axis
- Symmetry within an axis
- Abstract notions of direction
- Alignment behaviour between regions and over time
- Intervals between determination of orientation at a monument and its fuller construction
- The status of the axis
- Types of axis
- -Scope of intended axial usage: transient or continuing
- -Degree of active involvement of the axis in ritual at the site
- -Range of physical relevance
- Directed ritual: transmission and reception
- Definition and analysis of data
- Section 02b: Possible targets for alignment
- Potential targets for orientation of monuments
- Problems of interpretation
- Types of target
- Random alignment
- Topographical conformity
- Imitative alignment
- Reference to celestial cues
- Axial compromise: a case from the Cotswold-Severn group of long barrows
- Use of other monuments as targets
- Axial combination
- Alternatives for targeting the solar transit
- The influence of climatic factors on orientation
- Use of celestial targets
- The type of astronomical object involved
- Use of universal or site-specific targets
- Reference to the solar cycle, and use of limiting positions
- The complexity of the astronomical target
- The elevation of the astronomical object, or event, used to determine orientation
- Solar shadow-casting
- The transit of the sun
- Reference to the lunar cycle
- Use of stellar and planetary cycles
- Other considerations
- Orientations beyond the solar and lunar range
- Properties of data from observation of a moving solar target
- Latitude-dependent factors affecting alignment of monuments
- Local onset of the seasons
- Properties of the solar cycle
- The seasonal-solar model of alignment for long barrows: a simplified example
- Test areas
- The model
- Conclusions
- Discussion
- Divisions of the year
- The Celtic agrarian calendar
- The megalithic calendar
- Stellar motion and the agricultural calendar: Classical sources
- Section 02c:
Astronomical issues
- Methods
- Calculation of astronomically significant positions within the solar and lunar cycles at defined latitudes: rising, setting, and transit
- Solar events
- Lunar events
- Problems with over-specific use of astronomical data
- Adjustment of solar and lunar risings and settings for topography at the local horizon
- The solar transit: properties
- Basic physical properties of the solar transit
- Definitions
- -limiting positions of the transit on the horizon
- -zonation of the transit and changes in its properties with latitude
- Axial intersection of the solar transit: transit-frequency
- Solstices and equinoxes: the effects of latitude and longitude on azimuth and timing
- Tracking the solar transit
- Dwell-time of the sun in a particular direction: seasonal variation
- Use of near-setting or -rising positions of the sun as cues for alignment: implications for the seasonal-solar model of alignment behaviour
- Alignments: banding for analysis of regional distributions
- Visualising the solar transit at winter minimum (e-FIGS AS-04b and c)
- The lunar transit: properties
- Basic properties of the lunar transit
- Complexity of the lunar transit
- Combination of lunar and solar cycles
- S’n moon-skim: the minimal lunar transit between major S’n standstills
- Constellations
- The Orion group
- Brightness
- Directions of rising and setting
- Patterns of rising and setting during the year
- Changes in the daily timing, and visibility of rising, and settings over millennia
- Consideration of other stars as potential targets for alignment of monuments
- Stars: changing visibility in the night sky: specific examples
- The Orion group
- Planets
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Methods
- Groups of monuments in the analysis
- Section 03: Axial alignment amongst particular groups of monument
- Analysis of the orientation of long barrows,
and other chambered tombs from the European Neolithic
- Introduction
- The monuments and their orientation
- Aspects of orientation for assessment
- Proposal of some general model for orientation
- The need for comparative studies
- Evolution of alignment-practice
- Existing interpretation of orientation amongst chambered tombs
- The nature of the axis at long barrows
- The timing of its construction
- Types of axial structure
- Persistence of the axis
- Complications in measurement of axes
- Asymmetric sites
- Symmetrical sites
- Composite monuments
- Directionality at long barrows
- Facing versus pointing
- Structural trends
- Alignment of human remains
- Analysis of alignment amongst groups of long barrows
- Results of the analysis
- Factors determining axial alignment amongst these funerary monuments
- The seasonal-solar model (e-FIG CO-02);
- Grouping of sites
- Factors interacting to determine the axis of a long barrow
- Anomalous orientation of passage tombs in Ireland
- The Orion group of constellations: possible relevance of risings and settings to funerary ritual
- Determination of environmental factors important in seasonally-dependent models for monumental construction: application to long barrows
- Onset of the seasons
- The basic cycle
- The seasonal labour cycle
- The ergonomics of monumental construction
- Timing of construction projects
- Interpretation of barrow alignment in terms of seasonal activity (e-FIGS LB-41 and 41a)
- Comparison of barrow alignment over the range of latitudes
- Orientation of longhouses
- Relationship with long barrows
- Climatic cues
- -Neolithic longhouses
- -comparison of orientation between Neolithic barrows and longhouses
- -other long- and round-houses
- -anthropological parallels
- Cues for alignment
- Directed illumination of interior structures at chambered tombs
- Introduction
- The case against directed illumination
- General conclusions
- Properties of candidate monuments
- Alternative interpretations
- -deposition and display
- -Knowth site 1: alternative uses of light
- Supplementary information on sites: directed illumination
- Study area: long barrows in the N’n Cotswolds
- The general area and its long barrows
- Analysis of orientation (e-FIG LB-16 and 17)
- Siting of barrows
- The detailed study area: N’n Cotswolds (e-FIG LB-89)
- Long barrows: interaction between axis and topography: comparative analysis of long barrows in the Cotswolds, mid-Wye valley, and on the Lincolnshire Wolds
- The study areas
- Conclusions
- Differences in mean axial alignment between samples of long barrows from the Cotswolds and Lincolnshire Wolds: relevance for the seasonal-solar model of barrow construction
- The Dorstone Hill complex; Herefs; SO 3242;
- More detailed analysis of orientation within regional groups of funerary monument
- Case study 1: long barrows in S’n England (e-FIG LB-92)
- Case study 2: barrow groups from Scotland (e-FIG LB-93)
- General discussion
- Regional variation and latitude-dependant effects
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Appendix: sites producing data used in the analysis:
- Introduction
- Section 03a:
- Section 03b:
- The orientation of augmented long barrows in Britain
- Introduction
- Problems in use of the term ‘bank barrow’
- Further definition of length and shape amongst long barrows
- Redefinition of this group of long barrow-like monuments
- Analysis of orientation amongst augmented barrow monuments
- Supplementary information: details of sites
- Composite barrows
- Linked sites
- Unitary sites
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Introduction
- Section 03c:
Analysis of the orientation of cursus monuments in Britain
- Cursus monuments and their orientation
- General introduction
- Context
- Definition
- Distribution
- Function
- Location
- Properties
- Illustrated examples
- The scope of this analysis, and inherent problems
- Analysis of orientation at cursus sites
- Alignments and the solar transit
- Methods
- Results
- Structural differentiation between directions in the axis of cursus monuments
- Aspects of distribution and associations of cursus sites
- Case studies: spatial analysis of surrounding monuments and their possible relationship with axial alignment of the cursus
- The Dorset Cursus (see Table of Contents: 03c/8a; e-FIGS CU-03 to 06)
- The Fladbury group of smaller cursoid enclosures; SO 9846; Evesham, Worcs; e-FIGS CU-08 and 08a;
- The Rudston cursus complex (see Table of Contents: 03c/8b; e-FIGS CU-12 to 14)
- Existing astronomical interpretation: one example
- The relationship between alignment of cursus sites and solstitial axes
- General conclusions
- Association between barrows and cursus monuments
- Evidence for differentiation between the ends of cursus monuments
- Case studies
- Dorchester on Thames; Oxon; SU 5795; length >1600; width 60m; axis 128-308oG; NMR SU59NE 5; e-FIGS CU-02 and 21;
- The Dorset Cursus; Dorset; SU 0115; length 9900m; width about 100m; axis 049-229oG between extreme terminals; NMR linear 41; e-FIGS CU-03 to 06; phot CU-01 to 02;
- Drayton; Oxon; SU 4894; total length 1700m; width 75m; axis: N’n sector 016-196oG, S’n sector 025-205oG; NMR SU49SE 83; e-FIG CU-07; phot CU-03;
- Fornham All Saints; Suffolk; TL 8367; length >1870m; width 23-34m; axis 142-322oG; NMR TL86NW 11; e-FIGS CU-09 and 21;
- Rudston complex; Humberside; TA 0969; length: Rudston D 3900m, others as outlined below; width: Rudston D 50-90m; axis 005-185oG; NMR TA06NE 48; e-FIGS CU-12 to 14; TABLE CU-11;
- Scorton; North Yorks; NZ 2300; length 1676m; width 32m; axis 132-312oG; NMR NZ20SW 11; e-FIG CU-15; phot CU-04;
- Stonehenge Greater Cursus; SU 1243; length 2750m; width 100-150m; axis 083-263oG; NMR SU14SW 42; e-FIG CU-17; phot CU-05;
- Stonehenge Lesser Cursus; SU 1043; length 400m; width 60m; axis 075-255oG; NMR SU14SW 41; e-FIG RB-101; phot CU-06;
- Appendix: listing of known and probable cursus monuments included in the analysis
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03d:
Orientation of prehistoric stone rows in Britain and Ireland
- The distribution of stone rows in Britain and Ireland
- General form, development, and date
- Distribution
- Matching distributions of rows and barrows against topography, and other environmental factors
- The function of stone rows
- A preview of problems: Down Tor stone row; Dartmoor; SX 5869;
- Supplementary information
- The orientation of stone rows
- Interpretation of stone rows by Burl (1993)
- Analysis of alignment amongst stone rows by Ruggles (1999)
- Alignment of short stone rows in Scotland and Ireland: re-analysis by the author [AJM] of data presented by Ruggles (1999), as outlined above
- -Ireland (e-FIG SR-27)
- -Scotland (e-FIG SR-28)
- Interpretation of alignment: a recent example
- Orientation of rows on Dartmoor
- Summary
- Study area: stone rows on Dartmoor (e-FIGS SR-01 to 14)
- Distribution of stone rows across the landscape (e-FIG SR-01)
- Distribution of rows by altitude (e-FIG SR-03; TABLE SR-05)
- Location of rows on slopes (e-FIG SR-04)
- Association of rows with other monuments (TABLE SR-06)
- Cues for alignment: some existing views
- Orientation of rows (e-FIGS SR-05)
- Structural augmentation at stone row sites
- Supplementary information: groups of rows on Dartmoor
- Case study: multiple rows in N’n Scotland (e-FIG SR-15)
- General properties of these multiple stone rows
- Analysis of alignment at these sites
- Existing astronomical interpretation
- Parallels beyond the region
- Proposed function of these multiple stone rows
- Supplementary information: further details of multiple stone rows in Scotland
- Beaghmore; Tyrone; Ulster; H 685 842; e-FIG SR-26;
- Structures
- Alignment at the site
- Existing astronomical interpretation
- Minilithic stone rows: the hidden sample
- A basic monumental format: ‘axis-with-terminals’
- Karahunj: a row-complex on the Armenian plateau
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- The distribution of stone rows in Britain and Ireland
- Section 03e:
- Structural orientation amongst stone circles in Britain
- Orientation of structural elements at stone circles
- Basic properties of stone circles
- General introduction
- Issues of alignment
- Orientable structures at stone circles
- The topographical setting of circles
- The stones in the circle itself
- Recumbent and axial stone circles
- Interpretation of alignment
- Re-interpretation in terms of alignment on the solar transit
- Structures external to the circle
- The complex of associated monuments
- Circles with an outlying stone pillar to the SW
- Supplementary information on individual sites
- Callanish; Lewis; Outer Hebrides; NB 213 330; NMR NB23SW 1; (e-FIGS SC-01 to 03);
- Cerrig Duon; Brecknockshire, Wales; SN 8511 2060; Coflein 412996; e-FIG SC-04;
- Long Meg and Her Daughters; Cumbria; NY 5711 3721; NMR NY53NE 5, 12199; e-FIGS SC-05 and 06;
- Rothiemay recumbent stone circle; Banffshire; NJ 5508 4872; NMR NJ54NE 6; e-FIG SC-07;
- Sunhoney recumbent stone circle; Aberdeen; NJ 71592 05701; NMR NJ70NW 55; e-FIG SC-08;
- Stone circles: orientable structures
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Orientation of structural elements at stone circles
- Section 03f:
- The orientation of henges and related monuments in Britain
- Introduction
- Function
- General properties
- Grouping
- Case Study: large henge enclosures
- Alignment at large henge enclosures (LHEs)
- Large mounds of round barrow type associated with these henges
- Alignment of henges and large barrows
- Avebury; Wiltshire; sub-circular; inner ditch, outer bank; diameter 450m maximum; interior area 11.5 ha; entrances: 4, two opposed pairs, 068-257oG, and 164-332oG; SU 1026 6996; NMR 220746; e-FIG HE-01; phot HE-01 to 04;
- Marden; (English Heritage: Hatfield earthworks); Wiltshire; sub-ovate; inner ditch, outer bank, 500m across N-S, 350m across E-W; area 15.5ha; entrances: 1, at 353oG from the centre; perimeter open at S to W, but there is some aerial evidence for a bank i
- Durrington Walls: this site is included below, in the case study for the Stonehenge area.
- Mount Pleasant; Dorset;
- -Duggleby Howe; round barrow without a ditch, lying central to the enclosure, diameter 38m, height 6.5m; SE 8804 6688; NMR SE86NE 2;
- Atypical sites
- Case study: linear groups of henges
- Details of individual sites
- Priddy; Somerset;
- Thornborough; North Yorkshire
- Knowlton; Dorset
- Introduction
- Details of individual sites
- Case study: hengiform monuments in the Milfield basin (e-FIGS HE-10 to 20)
- Introduction
- Henges and the avenue (e-FIGS HE-10 to 20)
- Key sites in the area: further details
- Rock art
- The settlement pattern in the study area
- Introduction
- Dispersed linear groups of henges
- Case study: hengiform monuments in the Swale-Ure valley (e-FIGS HE-21 to 28)
- Introduction
- Interpretation of axial data
- Key sites in the area: further details
- Introduction
- Study area: Salisbury Plain (e-FIGS HE-29 to 35)
- Further details of individual sites
- Durrington Walls; Wiltshire; sub-oval; inner ditch, outer bank; diameter 516m; area 20.9ha; entrances: 3, minor single at 175oG, and paired at 124-304oG; SU 1501 4375; associated sites: Woodhenge; NMR 219364; e-FIG HE-02.
- Woodhenge; Wiltshire; sub-oval; inner ditch, outer bank; diameter 90m; area 0.63ha; entrances: 1, at 025oG; SU 1506 4337; associated sites: Durrington Walls henge; NMR 219050; e-FIG HE-02;
- Amesbury 50; Wiltshire; hengiform; weakly ovate; ditch, and inner post ring around a central platform; entrances: none clear; SU 1148 4269; e-FIG HE-31 and RB-84;
- Coneybury; Wiltshire; ovate; inner ditch, outer bank; ditch 45 by 55m in plan; area >0.2ha; entrances: 1, at 070oG; SU 1342 4160; NMR 219462; e-FIG HE-29; phot HE-06;
- Newhenge complex; Wiltshire;
- Amesbury 9; Wiltshire; hengiform;
- Stonehenge; Wiltshire; SU 1225 4240; NMR SU14SW 4; e-FIGS HE-29 to 35; phot HE-14 to 20;
- General interpretations of the Stonehenge area
- -The approach to Stonehenge
- -The local monument complex
- -The site itself
- Alignments at the site
- Stonehenge: SW’n cemeteries; general area: SU 120 420; e-FIG HE-31;
- Palisade trench just to the N of Stonehenge; SU 1177 4213 to SU 1279 4278; SU14SW 154; 219850; e-FIG HE-31;
- Analysis of orientation for the entire sample of henges (e-FIG HE-39)
- Introduction
- Analysis
- Comments on groups of henges and specific sites
- -linear groups of henges
- -large henge enclosures (case study above: large henge enclosures)
- Possible sub-groups
- Clarity of views from the interior of henges
- Outer perimeters of henges: the shaft-ring at Durrington Walls
- Durrington Walls henge:
- Structural analysis of the shaft-ring (e-FIGS HE-44)
- Summary [analysis and conclusions by AJM: from data in Gaffney et al. 2020]
- Current astro-archaeological ‘analysis’
- A different interpretation
- Parallels
- Shafts: ritual, functional, or both
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Introduction
- Prehistoric rock-art in Britain: orientation of motifs within panels
- Introduction
- Distribution of rock-art in Britain and Ireland
- Regional groups and local clusters
- Associations of cup marks
- Relationship between distributions of rock-art and regional groups of barrows
- Location of motifs at individual monuments
- Distribution of rock-art with respect to environmental factors (e-FIGS ND-01a and 01d)
- Motifs at rock-art sites: analysis of orientation
- Rock-art sites: topographical aspect of panels
- Rock-art sites: orientation of motifs
- Conclusions and interpretation
- General conclusions
- Study area: the Cheviot group (e-FIG RA-11)
- Study area: the Galloway group (e-FIG RA-09)
- Study area: the Tayside group (e-FIG RA-10, and 10a)
- Study area: the Argyll group (e-FIG RA-02)
- Supplementary information: rock-art on barrows
- Supplementary information: rock-art on standing stones
- Supplementary information: rock-art on stone circles and associated cairns
- Supplementary information: selected rock-art sites in Scotland and N’n England
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03g:
- Section 03h:
Linear round barrow cemeteries in S’n Britain: trends in orientation
- Introduction
- Cues for linearity
- Round barrows: types of linearity
- Analysis of linearity
- Long and round barrows: axes in common
- Linear placements of round barrows: status as composite monuments
- Ranking linearity
- The final form of a linear barrow cemetery: general properties
- Group assessment of axes: the data
- Models of growth at linear cemeteries
- Study areas:
- Data on monuments
- General content
- Linearity in the study areas: general conclusions
- Summary of nucleation and linearity of barrow cemeteries
- Study area: detail: Upper Thames valley (e-FIG RB-02)
- Study area: detail: Avebury (e-FIG RB-03)
- Study area: detail: Salisbury Plain (e-FIG RB-04)
- The area around Stonehenge
- The general pattern of barrows around Stonehenge (e-FIGS RB-04, and 278 to 281; HE-29 to 30)
- Alternative suggestions: a more cellular pattern
- Study area: detail: Dorset Cursus (e-FIG RB-05)
- Supplementary data: Dorset Cursus area:
- Study area: detail: South Dorset ridgeway (e-FIG RB-06; phot RB-01 to 03)
- Study area: detail: Mendip (e-FIG RB-07)
- Study area: detail: South Downs (e-FIG RB-08)
- Topics
- The dynamics of linear growth at round barrow cemeteries (e-FIG RB-277)
- Linearity as an expression of social status
- Closely linear cemeteries as composite monuments
- Sub-unit structure within LBCs
- Significance of directions within the axis
- Larger round barrows
- Location of round barrow cemeteries on, and around the axes of linear monuments
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Introduction
- Orientation of pit alignments in Britain
- Distribution
- Introduction
- Supplementary information: pit alignments of Neolithic to earlier Bronze Age date
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03i:
- Hyper-monuments
- Introduction
- Conclusions
- The barrow complex along the South Dorset ridge: status as a possible hyper-monument
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03j:
- Section 03k:
- Standing stones and menhirs:
monuments providing a vertical axis
- Definition of the terms relating to monoliths
- Introduction
- Date and function
- Occurrence of monoliths within monuments, and as single structures
- Menhirs in Brittany
- Patterns of settlement and activity
- Menhirs and agrarian symbolism
- Menhirs and repetitive structuring
- Menhirs in Brittany: ethnographic parallels: relevant insight
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03l:
Cemeteries of the middle Iron Age in E’n Yorkshire: graves, inhumations, and squared barrows: integrated analysis of their alignment
- Summary:
- The problem:
- Introduction
- Iron age cemeteries of ‘Arras type’
- -general form and content
- -inhumations
- -layout of cemeteries
- -orientation
- -chariot burials
- -grave-goods
- Overview
- Cemeteries included in this analysis
- Criteria for selection of data used in the analysis
- Case study: Rudston area: the squared barrow cemeteries
- General
- Orientation
- Squared barrow cemeteries: existence of functionally different areas
- Squared barrow cemeteries: structured growth
- ‘Standard’ burial-practice: the majority of cases
- ‘Warrior’-burials: a numerically minor but conspicuous complement, and culturally significant
- Inhumation burial during the Iron Age in S’n Britain: comparative data
- Chariot-cart burials in Britain
- -introduction
- -reasons for inclusion
- -dimensions of the vehicle
- -general types
- -orientation of the vehicle
- -relative size of their barrows
- Chariot burials in central-NW’n France
- Alignment: general discussion
- General considerations
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Appendices: filed separately in folder APPENDICES_filed
- Monuments formed by radiating concentric rings of posts or pits
- The more common and well-established group:
- A poorly known, provisional grouping, currently entirely residual:
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 03m:
- Analysis of the orientation of long barrows,
and other chambered tombs from the European Neolithic
- Studies in specific areas
- Section 04: Detailed studies: selected areas
- The range of more detailed studies
- Section 04a:
- Study area: the Stenness isthmus
- Reasons for inclusion
- Sites
- Topography
- Conclusions
- Supplementary information on individual sites
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 04b:
Study area: the Sligo area
- Reasons for inclusion
- The Sligo peninsula and its hinterland
- -the Sligo area: a more detailed examination of linked pairs of passage tombs
- Supplementary information on individual sites
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 04c:
- Study area: long barrows in the mid Wye-Usk valleys
(Herefs./ Breconshire; SO 23 [centre])
- Distribution of long barrows in the study area
- Reasons for inclusion
- Axial orientation and topography
- Supplementary information on individual sites
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 04d:
- Study area: Brittany
- Reason for inclusion
- General distribution of sites
- Stone rows
- Megalithic enclosures
- The area (e-FIG SA_br-01)
- Axial orientation of stone rows and megalithic enclosures: published work
- Reassessment of axial alignment
- Carved motifs
- Supplementary information on individual sites
- Summary information on stone rows, and megalithic enclosures
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 04e:
- Study area: Stanton Drew megalithic complex
- Reasons for inclusion
- Summary
- The general site, and its sequence of development
- Topography
- The main circle
- Axial alignment at the site
- Structural basis
- Astronomical targets for alignment
- Other structures
- The NE’n circle
- The SW’n circle
- The function of the complex
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Environmental issues
- Climatic and environmental change in Britain and Ireland during the Neolithic and Bronze Age: evidence for environmental stress, and its possible role in proliferation of certain types of axially-aligned monument
- Introduction
- Replication of ritual monuments as a measure of environmental stress
- Environmental factors in the study area
- Sources of evidence for climatic change
- Water-borne sedimentary deposits
- Aerial fall-out
- Palaeo-botanical sources
- Overview of changing climate in W’n Europe: 4000-650 BC
- General trends
- The Meghalayan stage of the Holocene epoch
- Major factors determining climate over the N’n Atlantic seaboard
- Analysis of marine sediments in the N’n Atlantic: the Bond Events
- Phases of climatic deterioration
- More detailed analysis of changing temperatures
- Conclusion
- Evidence for alluvial activity in river valleys
- Stratigraphic analysis of peat and mire deposits in Britain and Ireland
- Data from analysis of tree-rings
- -W’n USA
- -Ireland
- -Sweden
- The environmental effects of volcanic activity
- Introduction
- The atmospheric effects of explosive volcanism
- Major volcanic eruptions: a global perspective
- Prehistoric eruptions
- Historic eruptions
- More modern eruptions
- Volcanic eruptions in Iceland
- Location of volcanism
- Scale of eruption
- Frequency of volcanism
- Historic eruptions: comparative data
- Periodicity of eruption
- Further details of specific volcanoes
- An overview of Icelandic volcanism during the later prehistoric period
- Climate and volcanism: vulnerability of the N’n Atlantic area
- Environmental data from ice-cores
- Relevant studies involving ice-cores
- Data from ice-cores for the past two millennia
- Conditions of temperature in the Arctic since 7000 BC: relevant data from Greenland
- Relevant parallels from the historical record
- Evidence for adaptation to changing conditions in Britain and Ireland during the Neolithic and Bronze Age
- Adaptation of agrarian communities: a general hypothesis
- The impact of volcanism on agrarian communities of prehistoric type
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Replication of ritual monuments as a measure of environmental stress
- Introduction
- Section 05
- Climatic and environmental change in Britain and Ireland during the Neolithic and Bronze Age: evidence for environmental stress, and its possible role in proliferation of certain types of axially-aligned monument
- Symbolism
- Section 06: A brief review of solar symbolism during the Neolithic and Bronze Age
- Evidence for solar symbolism in ritual of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in NW’n Europe
- Rock-art: possible solar motifs from Britain and Ireland
- Interpretation of circular, and cup-related motifs
- Alternative interpretation of circular motifs in rock-art: terrain-mapping and solar symbolism
- Solar symbolism: generic forms
- Objects
- Sun-discs
- Wheel-pendants
- Symbolism amongst monuments
- Association of solar discs with vehicles
- -carts, or chariots
- -boats
- Solar deities
- Symbolism in relation to monumental alignment
- Interpretation of motifs
- Internal and external panels
- Rock-art from N’n Britain: basic characteristics
- Rock-art on passage tombs, and on external rock-surfaces
- The function of panels
- Conclusions
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Rock-art: possible solar motifs from Britain and Ireland
- Evidence for solar symbolism in ritual of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in NW’n Europe
- Ethnographic parallels
- Section 07: An ethnographic context for stone rows
- Application of ethnographic data
- Specific case studies
- NW’n Europe: later Neolithic to Bronze Age
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Australia
- Medicine-wheels from the American North-West
- India
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Specific case studies
- Application of ethnographic data
- Other sections
- Section 08: Conclusions
- e-FIGURES: combined listings and supporting information
- Section 09: Bibliography
- Section 10: Captions for photographs
- Section 11:The chariot of the sun
- Online section: https://doi.org/10.32028/9781789697056-online
- Back Cover
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |