Details
Title | Productivity in Higher Education |
---|---|
Other creators | Hoxby Caroline M.,; Stange Kevin; Strange Kevin |
Collection | Электронные книги зарубежных издательств; Общая коллекция |
Subjects | Education, Higher — Costs.; Educational accountability; Educational productivity; BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / General.; EBSCO eBooks |
Document type | Other |
File type | |
Language | English |
Rights | Доступ по паролю из сети Интернет (чтение, печать, копирование) |
Record key | on1143831412 |
Record create date | 2/29/2020 |
Allowed Actions
pdf/2157520.pdf | – |
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
|
---|---|---|
epub/2157520.epub | – |
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
|
Group | Anonymous |
---|---|
Network | Internet |
How do the benefits of higher education compare with its costs, and how does this comparison vary across individuals and institutions? These questions are fundamental to quantifying the productivity of the education sector. The studies in Productivity in Higher Education use rich and novel administrative data, modern econometric methods, and careful institutional analysis to explore productivity issues. The authors examine the returns to undergraduate education, differences in costs by major, the productivity of for-profit schools, the productivity of various types of faculty and of outcomes, the effects of online education on the higher education market, and the ways in which the productivity of different institutions responds to market forces. The analyses recognize five key challenges to assessing productivity in higher education: the potential for multiple student outcomes in terms of skills, earnings, invention, and employment; the fact that colleges and universities are "multiproduct" firms that conduct varied activities across many domains; the fact that students select which school to attend based in part on their aptitude; the difficulty of attributing outcomes to individual institutions when students attend more than one; and the possibility that some of the benefits of higher education may arise from the system as a whole rather than from a single institution. The findings and the approaches illustrated can facilitate decision-making processes in higher education.
Network | User group | Action |
---|---|---|
ILC SPbPU Local Network | All |
|
Internet | Authorized users SPbPU |
|
Internet | Anonymous |
|